who regularly visit our forums is also regularly Postings are the earning potential fraudulent promise or link collections contain pornographic sites.
delete such postings, we fairly quickly, but the forum they hurt nonetheless - and that might well be the primary purpose of these posts, because the IPs can be seen that the spam settings are the same users, in discussions anonymously express their opposition to the project term. The
since 1 March 2007 which came into force Tele Media Act prohibits § 6 paragraph 2, the concealment or disguise of the sender and the commercial nature of the message. The violation of the prohibition is punishable as a misdemeanor with a fine.
Our moderators
-existence is indeed voluntary, but this voluntary work is not synonymous with the agreement to bother with spam and can steal from the spam-authors of time as this respect it is not a thing of mere voluntary.
The deletion of spam with illegal contents on our political interest in the seriousness of the project beyond both our obligation under the above Act. We are liable as a forum, for the illegal posting of third parties.
Such a forum is not a "legal vacuum".
Therefore, the deletion of spam not a "hobby", but to us through the spam settings forced labor. Fully be clear the spam-authors must, therefore, that when we suffer because of their spam or other offenses in the forum to a complaint by other users in turn, will report even criminal charges against the perpetrators.
In the now almost ten years of the project, we are reimbursed several criminal charges. Three times the prosecution was taken. Of these, two were successful in the first case led to the seizure of the computers in the second case, the seizure addition to a criminal conviction. As to the third complaint
run the investigation since December 2007. The case is different in that the offense while in our web project has its cause, but took place outside the Internet.
are in contrast to the beginnings of the Internet and our very early start today, police, prosecutors and judges in criminal matters greatly Internet continues educated, take it more seriously, as well as the laws were tightened. This makes it easier for us to be directly injured to make damage claims as we are already happy in the past had that ever identified and penalized.
Nevertheless, we would have at that time the civil damages to claim, and thus may contribute to the development of law, but in that respect I was, unfortunately, "less in principle" because my weal and woe are not dependent on that I "Anyway, poor eaters" more money out of drag.
But such restraint is wrong, because that neglect such thugs only worsened their behavior. Therefore, I would at least quantify in future cases the cost of spam in its cancellation fee value and also make the Intangible damages, caused to the reputation of our projects as spam.
will surely lead the complicated arguments, refer to the opposing lawyers the loss of reputation as insignificant, but we will help to develop like copyright infringement packages, a settlement of the Intangible damage makes at least the merits of the rule.
In short, whether we counter illegal posting of content to delete, edit or display them, is initially always our risk as a forum, but not an excuse for the perpetrators of such postings. Then we point out regularly, but even without such notice changes to the legal position for the perpetrators of such postings not because they are facing the risk of prosecution even in the moment of illegal postings, which is why it is silly when replies in the interviews is: "That they all did so."
No project, we can not, especially in those discussions, the abused often enough as an extension of criminal wars will ensure that everyone is held responsible. We can at best, what we do: make one or the other that stands us in and out of punishment. The fact that this will in faith is to be done him wrong, because others are not liable, he could have been avoided by adding he would have either helped us to discuss with such - or he would have had to say goodbye just completely out of our discussions. That's how it is
Man "may therefore continue to abuse our forums, but they" may "not. That is the reason for the criminality and the damages, while the fact that someone is not the only thug in the world not be a reason for impunity.
Regards Mark Rabago>> discussion
0 comments:
Post a Comment