Connect Sound Bar To Blu Ray And Tv

If the fear of terrorism leads to the ERROR ...

I was actually already be in bed, but then I remembered again that day before yesterday a message from the chaos Inc. (also my children and me) struck like a bomb.

passengers are to be divided into risk groups

"German airports suggest to travelers to check their ethnic origin. Israel is already trying to protect it against terrorist attacks."

Source: Time Online

I quote from the article:

"German airports to beat the anti-terror fight a "profiling" by Israeli model before. In Israeli airports passengers will be in "risk groups" and controlled different degrees of severity. The criteria are ethnic origin, religion, age and life situation of the passenger. Apparently also a route, the method of payment, and the place where the ticket was purchased, relevant.

"In this way, the control systems for the benefit of all stakeholders are used effectively," said the president-elect of the German Airports Association (ADV), Christoph Blume, the Rheinische Post . "

With all due respect to security, but this is racism and first-class discrimination, justified by any argument, but not only contrary to Article 3, Paragraph 3 of our Constitution, but also against the Universal Declaration of Human Rights the UN. Flower While

now rowed back, and calls it now, only "one of many possibilities" to protect against terrorist, but only that it comes on so the idea is, so of absurd that I had a Comments can not resist.

How can I imagine this at all?
Should we then directly at the entrance of an airport show the pass, or would be with the strip search and the felting of the entire baggage, including waiting Embarrassing survey of travelers to check in?
Anyway, how can we get a Passport something about the religion or the living situation is? It would be so
first time out on the mere inspection. Um, yes, just so as a reminder, there are also German, which look like .

However, it is supposed to give people who are "suspicious" look and "suspicious" nations belong but any "suspicious" religion belong, Alevis or Copts, for example.
And even if everything fits, is not that far, that is a potential terrorist. Millions of people travel by air every day in all corners are Länder.Und sure they include hundreds of thousands of Muslims under it, because that is what the whole thing revolves.

other way around, there are also a number of German converts, Pierre Vogel brand, which one would never see it in life that they 'have ne screw loose. You can find

neither externalities nor in any risk markers, whether as a leading in the shield or not. There are simply no control of the uncontrollable.
hear When will these stupid generalizations and premature judgments on?

Otherwise you could just really soon introduce a public obligation to mark this risk group. This time, just the red crescent instead of the yellow star.

Israel is surely an example of the mockery. Everyone should know by now how the "ethnic" group with their problem, say Palestinians, around, They have learned that is among the best.
And no, this is not anti-Semitic by me, but realistic, something that is crumbling in this country slowly but surely.
that England also takes up the idea of me the way, not at all surprised. I remember how that their Irish "guest workers" in the seventies are being dealt with as the IRA was really active. Has the relationship with each other immensely strengthened, it must be said.



One can almost eat hardly as much as you want to puke ...


Links Next:

The West: If religion is a risk to security?

Radio Hamburg: profiling at the airport?

Inland Empire Youth Wrestling

The myth of "apolitical" - The K (r) with the distance FIGHT

Inspired by the same review also NPD BLOG.INFO , in which the goal is that "friend" Marcus winter time has again planned an event, I would like to briefly put my thoughts on the topic of "distancing" in words.

I do not know about you, but if someone in the course of a conversation with the award of "apolitical" is, I will always hear everything. Sure, Ausssagen, views, religions, music, art in general may well be apolitical in the sense that no political message deliberately wants to convey.

(Of course, also plays more into the political with the author, even if he is not aware of it because it is just part of his canon of values, and the same holds for the consumer, who just has a subjective observer, listener, etc., the interpretive monopoly held. Also people who are not at all interested in politics (should there be so) have won over too well politically interpretive opinion. )

Then we need but in my opinion not yet this s explicit instructions.

, I also have views that do not conform to the conventional understanding of political correctness. I let myself just do not like to dictate what I say or even think and can not submit to me any, of whatever kind, public opinion. Also, I sort

not really strict music for 'with good conscience audible "and" uh, uh, evil Nazi Mucke. "There are pieces that I like because of the arrangement or the lyrics, although the author may well be classified right remains. Good music anyway for me good music.
I have for example read the writings of Evola and is about his theory of free discussions. Some of his evidence I find at least not wrong. However, separate me and him, what values and political concerns, worlds!
Theosophy I find interesting, even if I know that it can very quickly turn into ariosophy.
what Nietzsche writes in his "Ecce Homo" of the emancipation, I can be affirmed as a woman, just from the heart, even if I risk it, tarred by "emancipated" women absorbed, and later stoned and burnt to. Most particularly by some "heathens" ...
I hate the internal-I ...

to all that, it requires no distance from me. This is just like that. As I said, the interpretation of the content is so with me and who takes the trouble to consider my views and my actions as a whole, will soon find out how I tick.

now I represent the views, the more it distances itself, makes you look more suspicious.
The question you should ask yourself should read it: How "harmless" is shown Opinion really meant when it is right in the same moment made a distinction from similar, but "objectionable" content? What
skeleton in the closet because there will be hidden?

nothing I can do is head for the cinema of my fellow man, but I thought some links usually say more about their inner life than I like.

Who wants to see in a "pagan" people a "Satanists", which will see one.
Who will classify any Christian or Muslim as an enemy of freedom, will find it.
Who wants to see his opposite number in a spinner, it will have the right and who is an Asatru or Abtu would also occultists as a "die-Nazi" will dig until he found the evidence.

This can not but cause one is justified, before you even indicted.
And even then I find it even better, with a clear conscience (if any) to the accusation with a shrug and a "You're right and I have 'my peace!" The answer than the hour or for long to file a plea in his defense, and hope for absolution, although it is clear that the accusation was contrived by the hair or simply due to sheer ignorance ... how poor is that?


And to top it all a few words to the opposite side politically correct:
who constantly for each manure "wolves, wolves!" screams of surprise no longer has, if no one listens to him when it actually show up once wolves.
Not to mention that these "wolves" are then often overlooked because you are too busy every tame "house dog" to impute malicious intent